Public reasoning infrastructure
Structures debates around claims, evidence, objections, verdicts, and learning outputs instead of unstructured comment threads.
Portfolio product · Civic intelligence
Clerisi
Public idea-testing intelligence for civic debate, evidence review, and editorial interpretation.
Project role
Clerisi helps public ideas become testable, traceable, and accountable.
Clerisi is a structured public idea-testing and civic intelligence product developed by We Doing Good Ltd. It is designed for debates, public-interest claims, expert discussions, evidence review, event formats, and editorial outputs.
The product is not a generic community platform. Clerisi focuses on the quality of public reasoning: what claim is being made, what evidence supports it, what gaps remain, what objections matter, and what outcome or verdict can be responsibly recorded.
Operator: Clerisi is developed and operated by We Doing Good Ltd, a Finland-based limited liability company. Clerisi is a product and venture brand inside We Doing Good Ltd unless a separate legal entity is explicitly created.
Open-call relevance
Why Clerisi fits democracy, media, AI, and public-interest calls.
Clerisi can support future calls focused on democratic resilience, misinformation analysis, civic participation, public-interest media, AI-assisted evidence review, and trustworthy public debate.
Evidence gap detection
Supports identification of weak public-interest claims, missing evidence, source-quality problems, and recurring misinformation patterns.
Event-to-resource conversion
Turns discussions into transcripts, summaries, claim maps, evidence trails, clips, reports, and public archives.
Problem
Public debate often produces noise without accountable learning.
Important public claims circulate through panels, media, campaigns, and online spaces, but the evidence, assumptions, objections, and outcomes are rarely structured in a way that people can evaluate later.
Solution
A structured layer for claims, evidence, and verdicts.
Clerisi organises public reasoning into repeatable formats that make claims testable, evidence visible, uncertainty explicit, and editorial outputs reusable.
Core capabilities
What Clerisi is being built to support.
Clerisi connects public participation, expert review, editorial production, and evidence governance.
Claim mapping
Breaks broad public arguments into specific claims, subclaims, assumptions, evidence needs, and testable questions.
Evidence gap analysis
Identifies where claims rely on weak evidence, missing sources, unclear definitions, anecdote, or unsupported causal logic.
Misinformation pattern review
Supports structured review of misleading patterns while distinguishing false claims, unsupported claims, uncertainty, and contested interpretation.
Debate formats
Uses formats such as Idea Arena, Idea Court, Breakthrough Stage, and Idea Lab to match the seriousness of the question.
Editorial derivatives
Converts live discussion into reports, explainers, verdict notes, transcripts, clips, summaries, and public knowledge assets.
Public reasoning profile
Tracks how ideas mature, weaken, change, gain evidence, meet objections, or require further review over time.
Pilot plan
How Clerisi can be tested in a funded open-call setting.
01
Topic and source baseline
Define the public-interest topic, approved source set, evidence rules, and moderator/editorial review process.
02
Claim intake
Collect public claims, participant contributions, expert inputs, event transcripts, or media statements for structured review.
03
Evidence and reasoning analysis
Map claims, evidence gaps, objection patterns, misinformation risks, and areas requiring expert review or clarification.
04
Public outputs
Produce verdict notes, explainers, summaries, claim maps, evidence trails, and reusable editorial resources.
Claim clarity
Percentage of public claims converted into specific, reviewable claim units with defined evidence needs.
Evidence quality
Improved visibility of source strength, evidence gaps, contested claims, and unsupported assertions.
Reusable outputs
Number of transcripts, summaries, claim maps, clips, reports, or educational resources created from civic events.
Grant-facing statement
Clerisi is a civic intelligence product operated by We Doing Good Ltd.
For future open calls, Clerisi can be positioned as a public-interest AI and media infrastructure product for structured debate, evidence review, misinformation-pattern detection, civic learning, and event-to-resource conversion.